If either Mitt Romney or Rudy Giuliani stayed in the race, would results be much different?

I would like to think so, and if they continued their campaigns--it would have made the Republican race THAT more interesting. McCain was practically a shoe-in, and having more competition would have made for great afternoon television.

If either Mitt Romney or Rudy Giuliani stayed in the race, would results be much different?
The thing that needed to happen was for Huckabee to drop out when he should have. Huckabee never had a realistic chance, and he siphoned off conservative votes from Romney, so effectively he handed the nomination to McCain. I blame Huckabee.
Reply:Duhhh. THEY LOST. If they had WON they would still be in the race. And yes, I guess the results would be different. LOL.
Reply:They didnt stay in the race...because they couldnt stay in the race...because they had no votes...








What is your question?
Reply:A bit irrelevant at this point, but, yes, definitely they would have made a difference...of course, do the math.
Reply:I have been giving similar thought to what you wrote and I am convinced that if Romney had stayed the curse he could have had a very good shot at the nominee. McCain was not that difficult to beat. It would have taken staying power and money for Romney.....and a change in campaign format.
Reply:Romney was winning. He should have stayed in.
Reply:You said it yourself...%26quot;McCain was practically a shoe-in (sic)%26quot; and he was was shoo-in before Giuliani and Romney dropped...that%26#039;s WHY they dropped. Five seconds more and you might have got there by yourself.
Reply:Romney might have had some impact -- not so for Giuliani. By the time the primaries rolled around, he%26#039;d lost all of his momentum. I doubt he would have suddenly picked it up in the middle of the process.



advertising